top of page

Dramatic Lineage of the Crimson Star

Classical Structure in a Mythic Setting

The Crimson Star is set in the golden age of Egyptian mythology, around 10,500 BC. Its characters bear the names of gods: Isis, Osiris, Horus, Seth. The series shows the mechanism of that transformation: catastrophic decisions becoming founding myths, names carved in stone drifting into sounds a child practises without understanding. But the dramatic engine is Greek: the collision of legitimate obligations that produces irreversible harm, and the discovery that the harm doesn't stop at the people who made the decisions. It reaches the carpenter who was twenty feet below the prince on the dock and never looked up.

Home
Projects

Classical Parallels

About

Isis: Clytemnestra Without the Vengeance

The parallel is not in violence but in the structure of authority. Clytemnestra governed Argos in Agamemnon's absence with a competence that exceeded his own. When the account was rendered, she told the Chorus exactly what she did and why. She didn't ask to be forgiven. She insisted on being understood.

 

Isis governs under a nominally present but functionally absent king with the same dynamic. She has held the preliminary comet report for three weeks. She has evacuation routes mapped, ship manifests drafted, mortality estimates completed. She has positioned the petition booth near the festival hall exit because she knows northern mothers stay near edges. She is waiting: not from indecision but from calculation. A managed disclosure with pre-positioned ships saves more lives than a panicked announcement. Her calculations are correct.

 

The critical difference is that Clytemnestra's competence curdles into vengeance. Isis's doesn't. Her tragedy is that power, exercised with genuine skill and genuine care, still produces casualties — and that even her own accounting of the cost was performed rather than weighed. She wrote six hundred to nine hundred deaths from the northern staging sequence. When she recalculated, the real figure was closer to two hundred. She had written the larger number because it sounded like a cost she had reckoned with. She hadn't. She is the most capable person in the room. Her capability is what makes her culpable.

 

The Clytemnestra structure also governs her relationship to the record. Clytemnestra stands over the bodies and narrates: here is what I did and why. Isis writes "Kiya. Seven. Near the booth. Near the wall." on the back of the festival layout she designed. She narrates to no audience. She narrates to herself. The insistence on being understood has turned inward, and the person she is insisting to is the one who already knows.

Horus: Prometheus With Shaking Hands

Prometheus brings fire to humanity because the alternative, leaving them in darkness, is intolerable to his nature. He cannot hold the knowledge and watch them suffer. The consequences of the gift are not his to control. The fire illuminates and burns in directions he cannot predict.

 

Horus confirms the comet's trajectory and cannot hold it. Every hour of concealment is, to him, a lie told to an entire civilisation. His mentor La Ah-Nu warns him: you hand a crowd a knife and expect them to know which end to hold, that's not honesty, that's carelessness. He hears this. He announces anyway, at a public festival, without preparation. Ten die in the crush, including a seven-year-old girl named Kiya whose mother had brought her to petition for medical care.

 

The Promethean structure holds through the series: truth delivered without preparation produces both salvation and catastrophe, and the deliverer cannot separate the two. Three days after the festival, Isis's own analysis reveals that Horus's chaotic warning saved three to four thousand more lives in the inland camps, because people started walking to higher ground before she had anything in position. The series never resolves which of them was right. Both answers are simultaneously correct and insufficient.

 

But the series adds a dimension Prometheus doesn't carry. Horus's hands shake. The tremor begins when the crisis becomes his to carry and never stops, except once. When he crosses out a stranger's name on the lottery manifest and writes in an eight-year-old boy he knows, his hand is perfectly still. The steadiest writing in four weeks. The tremor returns the moment he sets the stylus down. Prometheus suffers the eagle. Horus suffers the knowledge that his hand is steadiest at the moment of his deepest transgression.

 

He is also Oedipus in one specific register: undone not by blindness but by the limits of what even clear sight can cover. He sees the comet with total clarity. He does not see the crowd dynamics. He does not see the petition booth by the wall. He does not see the nine-year-old girl in the space between her mother and the stone. Clear sight and catastrophic peripheral blindness, simultaneously.

Seth: Ajax Who Survives

Ajax is the warrior whose violence is both his virtue and his contamination. In Sophocles, the contradiction destroys him: he falls on his own sword because the world no longer has a place for what he is. Seth carries the same structure but the series refuses to give him Ajax's exit.

 

Seth is a military commander from the annexed northern territories. He tells three hundred refugees at the eastern pier that the ships are loaded and there is no room. He kneels in front of a seven-year-old girl who asks why she can't get on a ship, and tells her the truth: she matters, but not more than the next person. When the Council votes to execute three of forty prisoners rather than leave them all to drown unseen in their cells, Seth does it himself. Each one is named. Each one faced. He removes his boots for footing on the blood-slicked stone and never puts them back on.

 

The Ajax parallel runs through his body. His feet, dark with blood from the executions, become the feet he walks on in the new settlement: wide, calloused, permanently marked. The contamination of necessary violence is literal and visible. But where Ajax cannot reconcile the warrior's virtue with the warrior's stain, Seth is asked to govern with both. To build a settlement. To find the orphaned children of a woman he executed and check on them weekly. To walk the earth of a new civilisation carrying the full weight of what the old one required.

 

He carries a leather strap with forty-two notches: one for every death in the northern territories he can trace to a palace decision. He adds Zahra, his wife, killed in transport protests three years before the series begins. After the executions, he decides not to add the three names. Whether it is the same thing is the question the series never answers and Seth never stops carrying.

Osiris: Oedipus and Priam

Two classical figures occupy the same character.

 

Oedipus built his reign on a story about himself that concealed a truth about himself. Osiris built his philosophy of governance on a lie about the great flood: he told everyone, including himself, that he acted too quickly, that forty died from his rashness. The truth: sixty died because he froze for three hours while the water rose. He rewrote himself as reckless rather than paralysed, because recklessness can learn restraint. Paralysis cannot learn anything. Twenty years of cautious rule, built on the wrong version of what happened.

 

The Oedipus recognition comes in a palace corridor. He tells Horus: he is the man who froze at the canals and made up a different story after, and he's still making it up. Like Oedipus, the discovery doesn't produce redemption. It produces clarity, and clarity is worse.

 

But his final act shifts the register to Priam. The ageing king whose last act of sovereignty is not a military decision but a human one. Priam goes to Achilles' tent to reclaim his son's body. Osiris crosses his own name off the evacuation manifest — the first decision he has made in twenty-six years that his wife did not make for him — and stays in a palace the ocean will flood by morning. He stands at the window with a cup of tea, northern blend, Isis's taste, not his, acquired from her over twenty years, and watches until the last vessel clears the harbour.

 

Priam's journey to Achilles' tent is the act of a king who has run out of sovereign options and has only a father's grief left to offer. Osiris's decision to stay is the act of a king who has discovered that the one thing his wife could not manage for him was the decision to be present for the cost. It is not brave. He says so. It is the only decision that fits, and fitting, for a man who has worn the wrong story for twenty years, is enough.

Nepthys: The Chorus With Authority

In Greek tragedy, the Chorus witnesses, remembers, suffers, and cannot act decisively. The Chorus in the Agamemnon knows something is wrong. They deliberate. They hesitate. They arrive too late. The Chorus survives the tragedy. The Chorus goes home.

 

Nepthys is the Chorus given the one power it has always lacked: the ability to make the record permanent. She does not judge. She does not intervene. She records. When the prince crosses out a stranger's name on the lottery manifest, she tells him she will document every detail: the name, his hand, the date, the reason, accurately, completely, alongside everything else. She does not try to stop him. She makes him visible.

 

The Chorus structure also governs her relationship to loss. Her mother died in the temple, sixteen feet from where Nepthys stood, separated by a wall and a rule about compassionate access. The last thing her mother said was "I forgive you": without saying what for. Eleven years of waiting for the rest of that sentence. The Chorus in Greek tragedy carries collective memory. Nepthys carries private memory — the weight of an incomplete sentence — and the professional discipline to ensure that no other record in her care is left incomplete.

 

Her archive is not a rescue. She knows this. She builds it anyway. When she leaves the temple with two crates of tablets, a clay figure of her mother's face against her chest, and a thousand-year-old drinking song tucked in her robe, she has made the only choice the Chorus is equipped to make: to carry what can be carried, and to name what was left behind.

Dennu: Até Made Visible

Greek tragedy calls it até: ruin that falls not through moral failure but through the workings of a force the victim cannot see. Dennu cannot see the force. He is below it. Twenty feet below the prince on the dock, testing a piling brace with his thumb, then his palm. The prince passes within arm's reach.

 

Dennu is a carpenter. He tests every joint with a signature gesture: thumb first, pressing for give, then his whole palm flat against the wood. Two seconds. Always. He builds the only tarp frames in the refugee camp that don't leak. He teaches a ten-year-old boy how to test a joint, guiding his hands to the wood. He fixes a woman's baby sling by refolding the shoulder section and testing the knot. He carries a dead son's drawing folded against his chest.

 

His name is drawn fairly by a blind priestess in the evacuation lottery. His name is crossed out by a prince who never saw him and who will, eleven years later, press his own palm against the carved letters of Dennu's name on a stone monument. Thumb first, then flat. Two seconds.

 

Até in the classical tradition falls from the gods. In The Crimson Star, it falls from a prince's stylus. The mechanism is the same: the victim is destroyed not by malice but by a decision made above and beyond his sight, in a room he was never in, by a person who will carry his name as weight without ever having seen his face. Dennu is the measure of what defensible decisions cost when they land on a specific person. He is not a symbol. He is a man who tests joints twice and carries a dead child's drawing against his chest. His gesture outlives the civilisation. His name does not, until someone carves it.

Senna and Raheb: Iphigenia and Orestes

Two children. The two positions Greek tragedy reserves for the young: the innocent whose death measures the catastrophe's true cost, and the survivor who inherits a debt they did not incur.

 

Senna is seven. She counts everything: tent poles, water jars, the people around her who have no one. She identifies the alone ones by noticing who hasn't been touched all day. She asks who decides who goes and who stays. She asks whether the person who decides is going to die too. She is seven years old and she has identified the structural question every adult in the series avoids naming.

 

Raheb is eight. He gives Senna his carved horse because he thinks he's staying and she should have something. When the lottery saves him instead — by a prince's hand, not a priestess's — he looks back once from the gangplank and raises one hand.

 

Iphigenia is sacrificed so the fleet can sail. Her death is the price of a military necessity that Agamemnon accepts and never recovers from. Senna's death is the price of a cascade of defensible decisions — the lottery, the loading sequence, the camp allocation — that no single person authored and no single person can be held accountable for. That diffusion is the modern element. The cost is ancient.

 

Orestes inherits Agamemnon's debt. He is tasked with avenging his father, which requires killing his mother, which produces a cycle of obligation that only divine intervention can resolve. Athena convenes a court. The vote is tied. She casts the deciding ballot. The cycle ends.

 

Raheb inherits without Athena. There is no court. There is no divine ballot. There is an eight-year-old boy on a ship who will grow up knowing he survived because his name was on a list, and a seven-year-old girl in a camp who held a carved horse until the water came. No one will tell him the list was altered. He will carry the debt without knowing its full weight — which is perhaps the only mercy the series permits, and it is not enough.

The Collision

About

The Crimson Star is not built around a single moral idea. It is built around the collision of several, each one defensible, each one insufficient, each one producing casualties that attach to someone's name.

 

The series discovers something that Greek tragedy already knew but rarely dramatises at this scale: moral necessity does not distribute its cost according to who made the decision. It distributes according to proximity, vulnerability, and chance. The queen who staged the northern quarter last carries her own weight. The carpenter who was drawn fairly and crossed out carries a different weight — one he will never know about.

 

What the series refuses is resolution. It never tells the audience whether Isis or Horus was right. It never suggests that Seth should have softened, or that Osiris should have acted, or that Nepthys should have intervened instead of recording. It shows that every position was legitimate, and that legitimate positions, in collision, produce the dead.

The Final Image: The Name Drifting

About

In Year 11 of the new settlement, a five-year-old boy sits at the base of the memorial monument, cross-legged, tracing carved letters with his finger. He reaches the ninth name and says "Amtep." The name is Amunet: a woman who spoke against the annexation, who said every word was true, who asked the archivist to write it down.

 

Horus watches from the darkness. Opens his mouth. Closes it. Does not correct him.

 

Tragedy does not preserve its dead intact. It preserves them as weight: carried, transmitted, gradually transformed by the hands and mouths that inherit it. Names become sounds. Sounds become ritual. Ritual becomes religion. The boy says Amtep. And means it. And is wrong. And is trying.

 

The series began with a prince who could not hold the truth and had to speak it. It ends with a man who holds the truth and chooses silence: not because the truth no longer matters, but because the child's imperfect attempt to say the name is itself an act of witness, and correcting it would replace his reverence with accuracy.

 

The name drifts. The weight remains.

 

Men become gods. The gods were people first. The distance between the two is measured in mispronunciation, and the mispronunciation is the only evidence that someone is still trying to remember.

About

KJ Williams is a screenwriter whose work focuses on people forced to act inside systems that function as intended, and who must live with what remains.


His scripts explore what happens when responsibility is exercised correctly and harm follows anyway. When no choice would have been cleaner. When the damage cannot be undone, only be lived with.


Based in London. 

For enquiries regarding screenplays or representation:

 

contact@kjwilliams.com

 

​

​

 

© 2026 by KJ Williams

bottom of page